Language Server Protocol vs Apache Thrift

The universal translator for code editors meets the polyglot's duct tape for stitching together services, because sometimes you just need to make java talk to python without the drama. Here's our take.

Language Server Protocol

Nice Pick

The universal translator for code editors. Finally, your IDE speaks every language without the drama.

Pros

• Decouples language intelligence from editors, enabling cross-editor support
• Standardizes features like autocomplete and go-to-definition, reducing duplication
• Active ecosystem with servers for many languages, from Python to Rust

Cons

• Can be slow or buggy with complex languages or large codebases
• Requires setup and configuration, which can be tedious for beginners

Apache Thrift

The polyglot's duct tape for stitching together services, because sometimes you just need to make Java talk to Python without the drama.

Pros

• Cross-language compatibility with support for over 20 programming languages
• Efficient binary protocol for high-performance communication
• Code generation from IDL reduces boilerplate and ensures type safety

Cons

• Steep learning curve for IDL and setup compared to simpler REST APIs
• Limited community and documentation for less popular language bindings

The Verdict

Use Language Server Protocol if: You want decouples language intelligence from editors, enabling cross-editor support and can live with can be slow or buggy with complex languages or large codebases.

Use Apache Thrift if: You prioritize cross-language compatibility with support for over 20 programming languages over what Language Server Protocol offers.

The Bottom Line

Language Server Protocol wins

The universal translator for code editors. Finally, your IDE speaks every language without the drama.