Dynamic

Language Server Protocol vs FTP

The universal translator for code editors meets the granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Language Server Protocol

The universal translator for code editors. Finally, your IDE speaks every language without the drama.

Language Server Protocol

Nice Pick

The universal translator for code editors. Finally, your IDE speaks every language without the drama.

Pros

  • +Decouples language intelligence from editors, enabling cross-editor support
  • +Standardizes features like autocomplete and go-to-definition, reducing duplication
  • +Active ecosystem with servers for many languages, from Python to Rust

Cons

  • -Can be slow or buggy with complex languages or large codebases
  • -Requires setup and configuration, which can be tedious for beginners

FTP

The granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire.

Pros

  • +Widely supported across all platforms and systems
  • +Simple and straightforward for basic file transfers
  • +No fancy dependencies or setup required

Cons

  • -Transfers data in plain text, making it a security nightmare
  • -Requires separate control and data connections, which can be a hassle with firewalls

The Verdict

Use Language Server Protocol if: You want decouples language intelligence from editors, enabling cross-editor support and can live with can be slow or buggy with complex languages or large codebases.

Use FTP if: You prioritize widely supported across all platforms and systems over what Language Server Protocol offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Language Server Protocol wins

The universal translator for code editors. Finally, your IDE speaks every language without the drama.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev