Plausible vs Matomo
Developers should use Plausible when building websites or applications that prioritize user privacy, require minimal setup, or need to avoid the complexity and data collection of larger analytics platforms meets developers should learn matomo when building or maintaining websites that require privacy-compliant, self-hosted analytics without relying on third-party services. Here's our take.
Plausible
Developers should use Plausible when building websites or applications that prioritize user privacy, require minimal setup, or need to avoid the complexity and data collection of larger analytics platforms
Plausible
Nice PickDevelopers should use Plausible when building websites or applications that prioritize user privacy, require minimal setup, or need to avoid the complexity and data collection of larger analytics platforms
Pros
- +It's ideal for personal blogs, small businesses, or projects where ethical data practices are a concern, as it offers a self-hosted option and doesn't require cookie consent banners
- +Related to: web-analytics, privacy-compliance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Matomo
Developers should learn Matomo when building or maintaining websites that require privacy-compliant, self-hosted analytics without relying on third-party services
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for projects in regulated industries (e
- +Related to: web-analytics, data-privacy
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Plausible is a tool while Matomo is a platform. We picked Plausible based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Plausible is more widely used, but Matomo excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev