Dynamic

Pnpm vs Bun

Developers should use Pnpm when working on JavaScript or Node meets developers should learn bun when working on javascript or typescript projects that require faster execution, simplified tooling, or improved developer experience, such as web applications, apis, or scripts. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Pnpm

Developers should use Pnpm when working on JavaScript or Node

Pnpm

Nice Pick

Developers should use Pnpm when working on JavaScript or Node

Pros

  • +js projects, especially in large-scale applications or monorepos, to significantly reduce disk space usage and speed up installation times by avoiding duplicate package downloads
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Bun

Developers should learn Bun when working on JavaScript or TypeScript projects that require faster execution, simplified tooling, or improved developer experience, such as web applications, APIs, or scripts

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for reducing build times, speeding up package installations, and running tests more efficiently compared to traditional Node
  • +Related to: javascript, typescript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Pnpm if: You want js projects, especially in large-scale applications or monorepos, to significantly reduce disk space usage and speed up installation times by avoiding duplicate package downloads and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Bun if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for reducing build times, speeding up package installations, and running tests more efficiently compared to traditional node over what Pnpm offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Pnpm wins

Developers should use Pnpm when working on JavaScript or Node

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev