Subscription Only vs Ad-Supported

Developers should learn and use Subscription Only when building products that require steady revenue, such as enterprise software, streaming services, or productivity tools, to ensure long-term sustainability and customer engagement meets developers should learn about ad-supported models when building consumer-facing applications, websites, or services that aim to reach a broad audience without charging subscription fees. Here's our take.

Subscription Only

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Subscription Only when building products that require steady revenue, such as enterprise software, streaming services, or productivity tools, to ensure long-term sustainability and customer engagement

Pros

• It is particularly relevant for cloud-based applications where ongoing updates, support, and infrastructure costs justify recurring payments, helping businesses avoid the pitfalls of one-time sales models
• Related to: saas, recurring-billing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Ad-Supported

Developers should learn about ad-supported models when building consumer-facing applications, websites, or services that aim to reach a broad audience without charging subscription fees

Pros

• It is particularly relevant for mobile apps, streaming services, and social media platforms where user acquisition and engagement are prioritized over direct monetization
• Related to: ad-integration, monetization-strategies

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Subscription Only is a methodology while Ad-Supported is a concept. We picked Subscription Only based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Subscription Only wins

Based on overall popularity. Subscription Only is more widely used, but Ad-Supported excels in its own space.