TDD vs Attribution Modeling

Write tests first, cry later—but at least your code won't break in production meets the marketing world's attempt to make sense of chaos. Here's our take.

TDD

Nice Pick

Write tests first, cry later—but at least your code won't break in production.

Pros

• Catches bugs early, saving debugging time later
• Forces cleaner, more modular code design
• Provides a safety net for refactoring
• Reduces regression issues in long-term projects

Cons

• Slows down initial development speed
• Can lead to over-testing trivial code
• Requires discipline that many teams struggle to maintain

Attribution Modeling

The marketing world's attempt to make sense of chaos. Because guessing which ad made the sale is so last decade.

Pros

• Provides data-driven insights to optimize marketing spend across channels
• Helps identify high-performing touchpoints in complex customer journeys
• Supports strategic decision-making with multi-touch analysis

Cons

• Models can be overly simplistic and fail to capture real-world complexity
• Requires clean, integrated data sources which are often a pain to maintain

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. TDD is a testing tools & methodologies while Attribution Modeling is a ai assistants. We picked TDD based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

TDD wins

Based on overall popularity. TDD is more widely used, but Attribution Modeling excels in its own space.