TypeScript vs Go
JavaScript with a safety net meets the language that makes concurrency feel like a walk in the park, but sometimes you'll miss the playground. Here's our take.
TypeScript
JavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.
TypeScript
Nice PickJavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.
Pros
- +Static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging
- +Excellent IDE support with autocompletion and refactoring tools
- +Gradual adoption allows mixing with plain JavaScript
- +Strong community and regular updates from Microsoft
Cons
- -Adds compilation step, slowing down development workflow
- -Type definitions can become verbose and complex in large projects
Go
The language that makes concurrency feel like a walk in the park, but sometimes you'll miss the playground.
Pros
- +Built-in concurrency with goroutines and channels
- +Fast compilation times
- +Simple, readable syntax
- +Excellent standard library
Cons
- -Limited generics support until recent versions
- -Error handling can be verbose
The Verdict
Use TypeScript if: You want static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging and can live with adds compilation step, slowing down development workflow.
Use Go if: You prioritize built-in concurrency with goroutines and channels over what TypeScript offers.
JavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev