Unity Physics vs Havok

Developers should use Unity Physics when building games or simulations that require high-performance, deterministic physics for large numbers of objects, such as strategy games, simulations, or VR/AR experiences meets developers should learn havok when working on aaa video games, virtual reality experiences, or high-fidelity simulations that require advanced physics and animation, such as in action, racing, or open-world games where realistic object interactions and character movements are critical. Here's our take.

Unity Physics

Nice Pick

Developers should use Unity Physics when building games or simulations that require high-performance, deterministic physics for large numbers of objects, such as strategy games, simulations, or VR/AR experiences

Pros

• It is ideal for projects leveraging DOTS to maximize CPU efficiency and multi-threading, ensuring consistent behavior across different platforms and hardware
• Related to: unity-engine, dots

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Havok

Developers should learn Havok when working on AAA video games, virtual reality experiences, or high-fidelity simulations that require advanced physics and animation, such as in action, racing, or open-world games where realistic object interactions and character movements are critical

Pros

• It is also valuable for projects using engines like Unity or Unreal Engine that support Havok integration, as it offers performance optimizations and specialized features like cloth simulation and vehicle physics not always available in built-in physics systems
• Related to: unity, unreal-engine

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Unity Physics is a library while Havok is a tool. We picked Unity Physics based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Unity Physics wins

Based on overall popularity. Unity Physics is more widely used, but Havok excels in its own space.