WebAssembly vs JavaScript
Developers should learn WebAssembly when they need to run computationally intensive tasks in the browser, such as 3D graphics, audio processing, or complex algorithms, where JavaScript performance is insufficient meets javascript is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.
WebAssembly
Developers should learn WebAssembly when they need to run computationally intensive tasks in the browser, such as 3D graphics, audio processing, or complex algorithms, where JavaScript performance is insufficient
WebAssembly
Nice PickDevelopers should learn WebAssembly when they need to run computationally intensive tasks in the browser, such as 3D graphics, audio processing, or complex algorithms, where JavaScript performance is insufficient
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for porting existing codebases written in languages like C++ to the web without rewriting them in JavaScript, enabling reuse of libraries and tools
- +Related to: javascript, rust
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
JavaScript
JavaScript is widely used in the industry and worth learning
Pros
- +Widely used in the industry
- +Related to: react, vue
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. WebAssembly is a platform while JavaScript is a language. We picked WebAssembly based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. WebAssembly is more widely used, but JavaScript excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev