Web Standards vs Vendor-Specific APIs

Developers should learn and use Web Standards to build websites and applications that are accessible, performant, and compatible with all modern browsers and devices, which is crucial for reaching a broad audience and complying with legal requirements like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) meets developers should learn vendor-specific apis when building applications that require integration with third-party services like aws for cloud computing, stripe for payments, or twitter for social media interactions. Here's our take.

Web Standards

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Web Standards to build websites and applications that are accessible, performant, and compatible with all modern browsers and devices, which is crucial for reaching a broad audience and complying with legal requirements like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Pros

• For example, using semantic HTML and CSS Grid ensures proper structure and layout, while following JavaScript ES6+ standards enables cross-browser functionality
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Vendor-Specific APIs

Developers should learn vendor-specific APIs when building applications that require integration with third-party services like AWS for cloud computing, Stripe for payments, or Twitter for social media interactions

Pros

• They are essential for leveraging external functionalities without reinventing the wheel, enabling rapid development and access to specialized features
• Related to: rest-api, graphql

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Web Standards is a concept while Vendor-Specific APIs is a platform. We picked Web Standards based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Web Standards wins

Based on overall popularity. Web Standards is more widely used, but Vendor-Specific APIs excels in its own space.